”"

Archive for the ‘fiction’ Category

What Black Writers Can’t Write About, Part II

Monday, February 8th, 2010

(What Black writers can’t write about—or 13 ways of looking at Black literature)

1. Interracial Sex (Romantic)

2. Interracial Sex (Freaky)

3. Black characters who have skin the color of food-- I once wanted to write about a character who had skin the exact color of a McDonald’s chocolate soft-serve milkshake but my workshop vetoed the description

4. Black ghetto life

5. Black middle class life

6. Barack Obama

7. Black liberals

8. Black conservatives

9. Homophobia

10. Being Light-Skinned

11. Being Dark-Skinned

12. The lives of Black women

13. The lives of Black men

So tell me, am I missing anything?

Black Writers

Hy and Barbara Brett—An early Valentine’s Day Post

Friday, January 15th, 2010

My neighbors from Brooklyn publish books, travel, write books together, and just generally have a good time. Each day, this loving couple experiences the life I hope to one day live.

hearts and love

Visit them at http://www.brettbooks.com/bretts.shtml.

Still Climbing: Subjects Black Writers Can’t Write About

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010

Are there subjects black writers can’t write about?

I’m thinking about this after meeting one of my former students for dinner. She asked me about a story I had written, a story featuring a character loosely based on her.

I tried to publish the story in a couple of different journals, but now I wonder if I should have. There’s a reason that story got rejected, and as a writer, it’s my job to figure out why.

A couple of possibilities: the end of the story features a rape, a rape that takes place within the black community, and perhaps there are some topics, because of history, because of more subtle—but still present—racial stereotypes, that black writers just need to leave alone? Or, perhaps, more likely, I simply do not have the skills (the depth and maturity) to write about this subject in a complex, truthful way?

There’s an argument to be made that black writers just shouldn’t go there. The first time I read Sapphire’s Push, I wondered if I were witnessing the Jim Trueblood-ing of literature (those of you who have read Invisible Man know what I’m talking about). We live in a society that still views black men as violent, dangerous, and overly sexual (and black women as emasculating, evil, jezebels), and music, movies, and magazines continuously pound those images into our heads. So it makes sense that we want to want to guard our images, to explore other truths, to tell the myriad other stories—stories of black men and women who fiercely love their families, who seek dignity and respect—that aren’t being told.

But do we leave behind the stories that don’t show us in a “positive” light? Truthfully, part of the reason that some “positive” books and movies about black people don’t receive widespread attention is that they’re not well-told; they don’t “keep it real” (the night I met a former student for dinner, one person in our party said that she fell asleep at a recent viewing of a “positive” black movie.) People are full of contradictions, and those contradictions are what make life interesting. Mother Theresa, Martin Luther King, Gandhi—these are people who made wondrous contributions to society, despite their personal failings. Shining a glowing light on black folks doesn’t generate good art, and it doesn’t begin to erase centuries of racial oppression. Our humanity comes not from creating work that is “positive” or “negative,” but by demonstrating fairness and honesty in our writing.

How do we do that? If we compare Sapphire’s Push with Toni Morrison’s The Bluest Eye, we find answers. Both Push and The Bluest Eye deal with incest in the black community, but Morrison provides the MacTeer family, an in-tact working-class black family, and Claudia, a narrator who has just enough emotional distance from the main character’s (Pecola Breedlove) rape to provide depth and insight. We also get chapters in which Morrison explores Cholly’s thought process–why would he want to rape his own daughter? (So much so that when we read The Bluest Eye in high school, a student in my class grew upset with Morrison for “defending” Cholly.)

Still, do black writers have to have the genius of a Toni Morrison to write about sensitive topics? When I wrote my story, I struggled with creating competing several images of black men and masculinity in one short story. I’ll probably revise this story a few more times before I send it out again because, ultimately, I think the balancing act black writers commit to—this questioning of how to keep it real and show black people in a range of situations and development—makes our writing stronger, our stories richer. I’m also trying to be more gentle in my criticism of Sapphire, and other black writers. I know that, to paraphrase Audre Lorde, these writers are trying to tell their truths and write the best story they can, in the best way they know how.

So black writers are still climbing the racial mountain. But my favorite essay in the world—Langston Hughes’ “The Negro Artist and the Racial Mountain”–always gives me hope:

If white people are pleased we are glad. If they are not, it doesn’t matter. We know we are beautiful. And ugly too. The tom-tom cries and the tom-tom laughs. If colored people are pleased we are glad. If they are not, their displeasure doesn’t matter either. We build our temples for tomorrow, strong as we know how, and we stand on top of the mountain, free within ourselves.

For black writers, our commitment to our humanity is part of our craftsmanship.

Victor LaValle, God, and the Big Machine

Sunday, November 29th, 2009

I think I spotted novelist Victor LaValle the other day. I was on 9th & 49th, leaving the most gully gym in NYC , and possibly the entire country.

Because I’m loud, and a bit obsessed with his latest book, I started screaming, “Victor…Victooooor! It’s me, Rochelle!”

Of course, Victor–or the person who may have been Victor–kept walking, his eyes directed straight ahead, his I-Pod plugged firmly into his ears.

Well, you know how southern black folks are. If we’ve talked to you for more than 23 seconds, we expect (demand?) a greeting (or, at the very least, a head nod). So I started muttering, “Why he didn’t speak?” And because I was red-faced (from working out) with little drops of sweat clinging to my naps, and talking to myself, a brother stopped me on the street.

CONCERNED BROTHER:
Miss–are you alright?
ME: Fine. Thanks. I’m just thinking about God.
CONCERNED BROTHER (looking even more concerned because of my disheveled appearance and the fact that this could very well be the start of one of those infamous New York street corner sermons): Okaaaay.
ME: No, seriously I’m fine. Sorry for worrying you. Thank you. Thanks for stopping.
Exit Concerned Brother to bank; Exit Rochelle towards apartment

Before I read LaValle’s Big Machine, I thought belief was something fixed. I grew up in a conservative town, and everyone I knew, whether religious or atheist, held such strong, immovable beliefs. And in many ways, I’ve always envied these people for their convictions, for their ability to know at all times, with absolute certainty, exactly what it is that they believe. Sometimes when I pray (uncertainty hasn’t prevented me from praying), I have these flashes where I feel connected to something grand and joyous and loving, and I think that what I’m feeling could be called God. But then there’s times when that feeling is far less strong, less present, and I question what I ever felt in the first place…The thing that neither my religious nor my atheist friends get is that you can’t make yourself believe, or vice-versa, make yourself disbelieve. What you feel is simply that–what you feel. I can examine all these reasonable, philosophical arguments about the existence (or inexistence) of God, but that doesn’t necessarily change my feelings. Perhaps it’s analogous to understanding the logic behind an emotion; you might understand the reasons why you’re angry, but that doesn’t mean that you’re less angry. And some scientists believe that your ability to feel strongly one way or another may be partly genetic.

So, there’s something comforting (to me, at least) about books like LaValle’s Big Machine, or Graham Greene’s The End of the Affair. Both books suggest that doubt isn’t something to be squelched or ignored.

(This will eventually blossom into an even longer post (my apologies), but right now I just want to do a quickie post on LaValle, his book, and my random thoughts about God and spirituality…)

UPDATE: Victor sent a really nice message explaining that he had just been in deep thought that day and didn’t see me. I know what that’s like (there are days when I’m concentrating so hard on something, I could walk past my own reflection), and we all have those moments when we just need to get lost in ideas, emotions, etc…And by the way, if you haven’t gone out and bought Big Machine, please use this post as a reminder to do so!!!

Their Eyes are Watching…

Saturday, October 24th, 2009

In a couple of weeks, I’ll teach Their Eyes Were Watching God to students in my African-American lit class.

I’m looking forward to re-reading Their Eyes because every time I read this novel, I discover something new. Their Eyes also makes me think of the Colson Whitehead issue described in the last post: how much should a writer leave out? how much should a writer tell?

Every time I read Hurston’s novel, I always have questions about Phoebe–who is she? Why is she singled out to be Janie’s BFF? How much does she truly know about Janie’s life?

No one I know seems to care about Phoebe, but as one of the novel’s few black women who exists outside of the community, I can’t help but wonder about her.
Halle Berry and Michael Ealy in Their Eyes Were Watching

“All Birthed”: Colson Whitehead’s Sag Harbor

Friday, October 23rd, 2009

Once, I had the opportunity to ask novelist Edwidge Danticat about her writing. “Whenever I read your stories, it feels like every sentence has a purpose,” I told her. “How do you do that? How do you make every sentence work?”

Danticat’s response, between giggles, was this: “You must think, Rochelle, that it comes out already birthed.”

Already birthed, meaning already figured out, powdered flesh and ten tiny toes already exquisitely formed. Meaning, that writing takes time, practice; that every writer goes through multiple drafts to figure out what it is she really wants to say and the best way to go about saying it…

I’ve been thinking a lot about writers and the deliberate choices they make. For a long time, I saw storytelling as intuitive, as something people understand or don’t. But now that I’m trying to do the Francine Prose thing and “read like a writer,” I want to understand why writers do certain things…

Which brings me to Colson Whitehead’s latest, Sag Harbor. It took me forever to read this book. (The more I like a book, the longer it takes me to read it. Keep in mind that when I worked at the literary agency, I read most novels in a couple of hours; it took me almost the entire summer to read Sag.) And, a couple of months after finishing it, Sag is one of those books that remains a mystery to me. Not too long ago, I told a friend that elements of Sag utterly enchant me: Benji’s hilarious obsession with Coca-Cola, the musical references that instantly draw me into a specific time and place.

But there are other things about the book that confuse me, that leave me wondering if they add to the book’s achievement or if they are, in fact, flaws. For one, there’s Whitehead’s style. His saturated prose, drips pop cultural references, dazzling images. I appreciate all those shiny, sexy sentences but can’t tell if they’re overkill or not. Sometimes I felt as though I were being told a story by a very cool friend, a friend much more together and knowledgeable than I’ll ever be. And because Benji is supposed to be such a nerd, the entire time I read, I felt a weird sense of inadequacy.

The other thing, the bigger thing, has to do with the novel’s structure. The part of the book I found most intriguing–the part of the book that made me question so much about the black family, my own life–had to do with Benji’s relationship with his father. So much of the book centers on Benji’s relationship with his friends, but when I finished the novel, all I wanted to know about was his family. His family is conveniently (too conveniently???) out of the picture for most of the summer. As readers, we get only glimpses of the tangled emotional abuse that’s the driving force behind how Benji sees himself. And because of what these complicated family relationships tell us about not only Benji but our own lives, I couldn’t help but want to understand them better…

I’ve always felt that black parents tend to be stricter with our children, to offer more structure, more spankings. And I know that part of this comes out of love–for so long, a black child’s misbehavior could mean death (Emmett Till), so we had to learn to control our children, by whatever means we could. But there’s this moment in Sag—when Benji’s watches the Cosby Show and sees the kindness and unabashed love that Cliff shows for his family and longs for a different kind of life— that Whitehead raises some of the greatest questions in “post-racial” America. As black folks become more accepted in larger society, as others recognize the extent of our humanity, will that be reflected in the way we treat ourselves and those closest to us? Will we learn new ways of showing tenderness to each other, of visibly showing compassion to those we love most?

These moments with Benji’s family are so complex and interesting, so real and true, that I forget Whitehead is writing fiction. But these moments are scattered in the book, hidden under other (and to me, lesser) stories. Still, maybe Whitehead is trying to make his readers ponder, maybe he wants to leave us confused, and like Benji, longing.

So what do you think? Does the brightness of Whitehead’s prose take you away from the story? Is Whitehead right to leave some things unexplored, or do you feel as though you need something more?

Books I’ve Been Meaning to Read (And Re-read)

Sunday, September 27th, 2009

This month, I’m re-reading Invisible Man & checking out Njabulo Ndebele (as suggested by my Tweet friends). I’ll follow up here with with a Francine Prose styled close reading of my favorite passages.
☮ Ω ♥ (peace, luck, and love)!

Checklists!

Friday, September 4th, 2009

The best advice (some of the only good advice, actually) I ever got from a woman’s magazine was to make a checklist to keep messiness in check. As a member of Messy-holics Anonymous, I was afraid to move in with my bf a couple of years ago–I didn’t want my messiness to overwhelm him. And so to make sure that the house was reasonable (not “neat as a pin,” but decent) I started making checklists that I mentally crossed off whenever I left the house.

1. Make sure the bed is made. [bedroom]
2. Aim for an empty wastebasket, but at the very least, make sure the wastebaskets are no more than half full. [bedroom/kitchen/bathroom]
3. Make sure there are fewer than three unwashed dishes in the sink. [kitchen]
4. Make sure that none of your clothing is on the floor and that books & papers are put away or stacked neatly [bedroom/living room]

Okay, it’s a short list, but for someone like me, it’s been a lifesaver. (I’m trying to develop a similar list for my office–it seems I’ve transferred the messiness from home over to work.) And now I’m wondering if perhaps I should make a checklist for my writing. The thing about checklists is that they give you such a definitive sense of accomplishment after you’ve checked everything off, and that sense of accomplishment spurs you to get even more done. Also, checklists are specific–you’ve either accomplished it or you haven’t–so you know whether or not you’re moving closer to your goals.

As I move into what I know will be a busy fall semester with little time for creative pursuits, maybe I should have a writing checklist like this:

1. Write for at least one hour a day (try a.m. to make sure it gets done).
2. Send off at least 5 pitches once a week.
3. Attend two readings this semester to get better acquainted with the work of other contemporary writers.

What do you think? Do you all use checklists? Do they work for you?

DeLillo’s White Noise

Friday, August 28th, 2009

The National Book Award Foundation discusses White Noise today. In response, here are my two pennies:

Initially I read White Noise because I was too intimidated by the size of Underworld and my girl Lisa Bauer told me I HAD to read it. Turns out, Lisa was right…

White Noise is one of those books that not only doesn’t seem dated–it feels especially true now that Twitter and cell phones and Facebook status updates are constantly competing for our attention. (In fact, White Noise’s brief excerpts from t.v. commercials read like tweets.)

I’m not sure what message I’m supposed to take from this book, but that’s the reason I like it…All of that “white noise”–the television, radio, the blogs, and now, the tweets–aren’t meant to make sense; they’re just a distraction from our ultimate, eternal destination.

Honest Critique?

Wednesday, August 26th, 2009

I always try to be honest when someone asks me to critique their work—I have too much respect for language and story-telling to lie. However, I think there’s a way to give criticism in a way that’s helpful and specific—it doesn’t serve a writer to tell her something isn’t working and then not explain why. Likewise, writers need to hear why a sentence or a chapter works. Receiving empty praise like “that’s good,” can be just as unhelpful as blanket criticism.

That being said, I have friends who ask me to critique their work, and I have no idea what they really want. One friend who always asks me to read her work, but she never sends her work out, doesn’t join writers’ groups or workshops, and as far as I know, doesn’t ask anyone else to read her work. This friend is a good writer, but I question how serious she is—part of being a writer is facing rejection, getting feedback (both positive and negative), and recognizing how the world reacts to your style and worldview. So, when writers don’t seek outside points of view, I question how dedicated they are to telling the best story they can.

Maybe they are afraid they’ll have an experience like this one (from Salon):

http://letters.salon.com/mwt/col/tenn/2009/08/26/bad_novel/view/?show=all